Britain says its bases are safe after US tankers leave RAF Mildenhall

Britain says its bases are safe after the US moved at least 10 KC-135 tankers from RAF Mildenhall, a move the Wall Street Journal tied to an Iranian threat.

A US Air Force KC-135 refuelling aircraft seen head-on at RAF Mildenhall in black and white
A KC-135 refuelling aircraft at RAF Mildenhall. (File photo) (Photo: US Air Force / Wikimedia Commons, public domain)

Key points

  • Flight-tracking data showed at least 10 US Air Force KC-135R tankers left RAF Mildenhall in England on Monday, with at least three Ospreys moving to nearby RAF Lakenheath.
  • The Wall Street Journal said the move followed an Iranian threat; the US European Command would not comment on force protection.
  • A spokesman for Prime Minister Andy Burnham said the protection of British bases is a top priority and answered 'Yes' when asked if he is confident they are safe.
  • The US raised security at Mildenhall and Lakenheath to FPCON Charlie, the second-highest threat level, the Journal reported.
  • It is the second such apparent evacuation in three months, after bombers left RAF Fairford in September.

The British government has said its military bases are safe after the United States moved a large number of aircraft away from RAF Mildenhall, an air base in eastern England. The move, which the Wall Street Journal linked to a threat from Iran, is the second time in three months that American aircraft have been pulled from a British base for security reasons.

What was seen

Public flight-tracking records show that no fewer than ten Boeing KC-135R Stratotanker refuelling aircraft departed from Mildenhall on Monday. Germany received one, Scotland one and Spain two; where the other six went is not known. Three or more Osprey aircraft also left, touching down at RAF Lakenheath, a second base about four miles away. Reuters checked a video taken by a passer-by that shows two Ospreys on the Lakenheath runway.

US European Command said aircraft are shifted between bases for many reasons, and that it does not discuss force protection measures. Requests to the White House and the Pentagon, sent outside office hours, had not been answered.

The British response

Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s spokesman called base security “a top priority”, saying ministers work with police and allies on it, keep the measures under constant review and are spending on air defence and counter-drone systems. Asked whether he was confident that the bases were safe, he replied: “Yes.”

What the Journal reported

The Wall Street Journal reported that an Iranian threat lay behind the move, and that American officials were still debating what exactly it involved. Citing a US official, it also said the security level at Mildenhall and Lakenheath had been raised to FPCON Charlie, the second-highest defensive alert.

Tehran denies involvement in particular attacks in Britain, but its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has declared airbases used by American forces, in Britain and elsewhere, to be legitimate targets. For months London has cautioned that Iran is plotting attacks and enlisting people over the internet to carry them out.

A pattern since September

When What happened
September The US removed bombers used in strikes on Iran from RAF Fairford after a group of men approached the base in white vans
October Two men were charged in connection with the Fairford incident; prosecutors allege one tried to help Iranian intelligence in Britain
October Britain’s domestic spy chief Ken McCallum said Iran-linked operations had led to more than 50 arrests in a year
Monday, November 9 At least 10 tankers and three Ospreys leave Mildenhall

Mr McCallum warned that Iran was trying harder to hit tougher targets, such as military sites, even though its previous activity had been limited by the lack of skill of the criminals it used as proxies. Mr Burnham has said that the activity at Fairford was “highly likely” to have been coordinated in Iran. The Fairford incident, which remains largely unexplained, drew wide attention, and we reported on the US removal of B-1 bombers from RAF Fairford and on Britain’s accusation against the IRGC.

Why it matters

Mildenhall’s tankers allow American combat aircraft to fly longer distances, so moving them is a sign that US commanders see a real chance of an attack, or want to be seen taking care. It also shows how far the war between the United States and Iran has reached beyond the Gulf. Western governments fear sabotage and attacks at home, not only strikes in the Middle East.

At the same time there is room for caution. The Wall Street Journal’s account rests on unnamed US officials, the US has not confirmed a specific threat, and the aircraft may simply have been moved for operational reasons, as European Command suggested. Iran has not commented on this report in the pieces we have seen.

The diplomacy runs in parallel. Washington said this week that major combat operations in Iran are unnecessary, as we report in our story on Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s talks with the G7, but defensive measures at bases show that officials are preparing for the possibility that the pause does not hold.

What to watch

  • Whether the US or Britain says what kind of threat prompted the move.
  • Whether the aircraft return to Mildenhall in the coming days.
  • Whether more arrests or charges are announced in Britain over Iran-linked plots.
  • Whether Iran responds to the reports.
Topics

Spotted an error? See our corrections policy ortell our newsroom.